https://github.com/rohasnagpal/legal-ai-skills/plugin marketplace add rohasnagpal/legal-ai-skills
/plugin install contracts@rohas-legalEach skill asks for the relevant facts, examines the connected clauses and gives you a consistent, reviewable result.
Rank material legal and commercial risks from one identified party’s perspective.
Explain what the agreement does and identify its core commercial terms.
Turn duties, deadlines, conditions and notices into a structured ledger.
Read warranties, indemnities, caps, carve-outs and insurance as one system.
Map exit rights, notice, cure requirements and post-termination consequences.
Identify changes across drafts and explain their effect without inventing context.
Draft complete replacement wording from the strongest credible position to the minimum acceptable fallback.
Develop opening, fallback, minimum and walk-away positions for open issues.
Build a complete contract from instructions, negotiated terms or a precedent.
Separate binding provisions from non-binding commercial intent.
Choose the skill, identify the party you represent and attach the relevant agreement or commercial terms.
“Review this SaaS agreement from the Customer’s side. Rank the ten most important legal and commercial issues, cite each relevant clause, explain the risk and recommend the amendment we should seek.”
“Summarise this share purchase agreement for our General Counsel. Cover the parties, transaction, consideration, conditions precedent, warranties, indemnities, liability limits, termination rights and governing law.”
“List every obligation, deadline, condition and notice requirement that applies to the Supplier under this agreement. Include the clause reference, trigger, due date, required action and consequence of non-compliance.”
“We act for the Supplier. Analyse the indemnities, exclusions, liability cap, carve-outs and insurance provisions together. Identify the stated cap, the cap that applies in practice and every category that may be uncapped.”
“We act for the Customer and want to terminate because of repeated service-level failures. Assess whether the contract permits termination now, the notice and cure requirements, the effective date and the provisions that survive termination.”
“Compare the indemnity clause in the counterparty’s draft with our standard clause. Show every material wording change and explain how each change affects the Customer’s rights, remedies and exposure.”
“Rewrite clause 12 from the Customer’s side. Give me the strongest credible liability clause, a balanced compromise and the minimum acceptable fallback, with complete replacement text for each version.”
“Prepare our negotiation positions on the liability cap and IP indemnity. Set out our opening position, fallback, minimum acceptable position and walk-away point, and identify concessions we can trade.”
“Draft a complete services agreement from the attached term sheet, acting for the Customer. Include the statement-of-work mechanism, acceptance, fees, IP, confidentiality, data protection, warranties, indemnities, liability and termination provisions. Flag any missing commercial terms.”
“Draft a letter of intent for the proposed acquisition that is non-binding as to the transaction terms. Make confidentiality, exclusivity, costs, governing law and dispute resolution binding, and state clearly that all other terms remain subject to definitive agreements.”
Use official repositories and licensed model forms, then check the date, transaction, jurisdiction and licence.
Yes. The plugin and its underlying skill instructions are open source under the MIT licence. Access to ChatGPT or Claude may depend on your account, plan, region and workspace settings.
That depends on the platform’s current plan rules, rollout, region and any controls set by your organisation. Check the interface available in your own account.
No. It is a drafting and analysis aid for legal professionals. Its output requires professional review and should be checked against the contract, current law and primary sources.
Most skills are jurisdiction-neutral, but legal effect and enforceability can depend on governing law. The skills are designed to identify when jurisdiction or current legal research matters rather than assume the answer.
It can work with text the selected AI platform successfully extracts from a scan. Poor OCR, handwriting, tracked changes, tables, stamps or missing pages can affect the result, so check the extracted text and clause references.
Yes. The Contract Drafter produces a full agreement from instructions, negotiated terms or a supplied precedent. The quality of the draft depends on complete commercial instructions and appropriate legal review.
Yes. The Clause Comparator identifies changes in wording and explains their practical or legal effect. It can compare draft rounds, a counterparty draft against a precedent, or the same clause across several agreements.
The skills can help assess public contracts and model documents that you supply. They do not treat public wording as proof that a clause is current, fair or generally accepted.
Installing the plugin does not create a confidentiality guarantee. Before uploading a document, check the selected platform’s current data controls, your client authority and your organisation’s AI-use policy.
Yes. The complete instructions are published in the GitHub repository under the MIT licence, so lawyers can inspect, test and adapt them.
In ChatGPT, use Chat for focused clause questions and Work for substantial document analysis where Work is available. In Claude, use Chat for focused questions and Cowork for longer document tasks. Every result still requires professional review.
Open an issue in the GitHub repository with the affected skill, an anonymised example where possible and the result you expected.